
Here's a trap I see all the time.
A founder wants to be customer-centric. So they add options.
"Some people want to start small, so we added a single bottle."
"Some people have sensitive skin, so we added a gentle version."
"Some people want to customize, so we added build-your-own."
Each decision made sense on its own.
But together? They created a mess.
More options feels helpful. But it's actually outsourcing the hard decision to your customer.
And your customer doesn't want that job.
Think about it. A new customer shows up. They've never used your product. They don't know what they need. They don't know how long results take. They don't know which version is right for them.
And you're asking them to choose from 12 options?
That's not helpful. That's overwhelming.
Here's what happens …
They freeze. Or they hedge. They buy the smallest, safest thing ... which is usually not enough to get results.
Then they evaluate too early. Decide it didn't work. And they're gone.
You didn't lose them because of the product. You lost them because the offer made them guess.
The reframe …
Choice feels respectful. Clarity feels relieving.
Your best customers don't want more options. They want fewer doubts.
So instead of asking "What do you want?" ... tell them "Here's where to start."
One clear default. One recommended path. One obvious next step.
You can still have options. But bury them. Make the default so clear that choosing something else takes effort.
Tomorrow, I'll share the biggest timeline mistake I see ... and why it's quietly killing your retention before customers even receive their first order.
See you tomorrow,
Jeremiah
P.S. Here's a quick test: If you removed half your options tomorrow, would the business feel clearer or more confusing? If the answer is "clearer," you know what to do.
100% Typo Guarantee … This message was hand-crafted by a human being … me. While I use AI heavily for my research and the work I do, I respect you too much to automate my email content creation.
There was no review queue, no editorial process, no post-facto revisions. I just wrote it and sent it … therefore, I can pretty much guarantee some sort of typo or grammatical error that would make all my past english teachers cringe.
Anonymous Data Disclaimer … Most of my clients prefer that I not share the inner workings of their businesses or the exact details of the marketing strategies we develop. In order to be able to share my own proprietary intellectual property without violating the sensitive nature of my relationship with them, I often anonymize what I share with you. This may include changing the specifics of their industry, what actually happened, or what we developed together. When I make these changes, I work to preserve the success principle I want to convey to you while obscuring sensitive data. This is necessary.
