Here's the pattern I see over and over:
A founder knows their demand is scattered. They can feel it. The metrics show it. The team senses it.
But when I say, "You need to choose one primary segment," they freeze.
And then they say some version of this:
"But our product can help a lot of people."
"I don't want to leave money on the table."
"What if we box ourselves in?"
"We're still figuring it out. We need more data."
I get it. Choosing feels like shrinking. It feels like you're turning away customers who could benefit.
But here's what's actually happening:
Broad feels safe until you have to pay for it.
When you try to speak to everyone, your message has to stay vague enough to include them all. That vagueness creates friction. Friction makes acquisition expensive. Expensive acquisition eats your margin. Tight margin makes every decision feel risky.
And now the thing that felt safe, staying broad, is the thing making your business fragile.
I worked with a skincare brand a while back. They sold a product that genuinely worked for multiple skin concerns: acne, aging, dryness, and sensitivity.
The founder didn't want to choose because she thought narrowing would cut her TAM in half.
So the homepage said something like, "Healthy skin for everyone."
Sounds nice. Means nothing.
We ran some tests. Turned out that women dealing with hormonal acne in their late 20s and early 30s responded way stronger than anyone else. The pain was acute. The outcome was clear. The apprehension was specific.
She was terrified to commit to that segment.
"What about the other people?" she kept asking.
Here's what I told her: You're not refusing to sell to them. You're refusing to organize your business around them first.
Once we rebuilt the messaging and offer around that one group, something interesting happened.
Acquisition got cheaper. Creative got easier. Cohorts got predictable. And yes, other people still bought. They just weren't the organizing principle anymore.
Within six months, revenue was up 40%, and CAC was down 30%.
Not because the product changed. Because the market could finally recognize itself.
Here's the thing most founders miss: Clarity doesn't shrink your business. Confusion does.
When you won't choose, you're not keeping your options open. You're making every downstream decision harder.
Your messaging team has to guess.
Your creative team has to invent.
Your media buyers have to hunt.
Your retention team has to rescue.
All because you wouldn't make one decision upstream.
Tomorrow I'm going to give you the tool I use to make that decision. It's a four-part sentence that forces clarity and eliminates hedging.
If you can fill it out cleanly, you have PMF. If you can't, you know where the work is.
See you tomorrow,
Jeremiah
P.S. The irony is that the founders who choose early usually end up with a bigger business than the ones who stay broad. Because they get to scale sooner, and scale is where the real compounding happens.
100% Typo Guarantee … This message was hand-crafted by a human being … me.
There was no review queue, no editorial process, no post-facto revisions. I just wrote it and sent it … so I can pretty much guarantee some typo or grammatical error that would make all my past English teachers cringe.
Anonymous Data Disclaimer … Most of my clients prefer that I not share the inner workings of their businesses or the exact details of the marketing strategies we develop. To share my proprietary intellectual property without compromising the sensitive nature of my relationship with them, I often anonymize what I share with you. This may include changing the specifics of their industry, what actually happened, or what we developed together. When I make these changes, I work to preserve the success principle I want to convey to you while obscuring sensitive data. This is necessary.