Let's talk about subscriptions.
I see this pattern constantly:
A brand wants to increase LTV. So they push subscription hard at checkout. "Subscribe and save 15%!"
It works ... sort of. Subscription sign-ups go up.
But then something weird happens.
Cancellations spike. Often at a predictable point ... day 30, day 45, month two.
The brand panics. "We need better cancel-save flows!"
But here's the thing …
The problem isn't the cancel flow. The problem is what happened before.
When you push subscription at checkout, you're asking customers to commit before they trust.
They haven't used the product yet. They don't know if it works for them. They're subscribing for the discount, not for the outcome.
That's not retention. That's a coupon with recurring billing.
Subscription should be the natural next step after results ... not a discount before proof.
Think about it from the customer's perspective …
Scenario A: "I've never tried this, but I'll subscribe because it's cheaper."
Scenario B: "This is working. I don't want to run out. Just keep sending it."
Which customer is going to stick around?
The fix isn't complicated …
Stop treating subscription as a conversion tactic. Start treating it as earned continuity.
Let customers experience the product. Help them see results (using the four pillars we covered). Then invite them to subscribe.
"Now that you've seen what this does, keep it going without thinking about it."
That's a completely different energy than "Save 15% if you commit right now."
Subscription sticks when it's earned. It churns when it's bribed.
Tomorrow, we'll tackle another trap that's closely related ... and it might be the most expensive mistake in ecommerce.
See you tomorrow,
Jeremiah
P.S. If your subscription cancel rate spikes at a consistent time window ... that's a clue. Customers are hitting a moment where they realize they committed before they believed. The fix is upstream, not downstream.
100% Typo Guarantee … This message was hand-crafted by a human being … me. While I use AI heavily for my research and the work I do, I respect you too much to automate my email content creation.
There was no review queue, no editorial process, no post-facto revisions. I just wrote it and sent it … therefore, I can pretty much guarantee some sort of typo or grammatical error that would make all my past english teachers cringe.
Anonymous Data Disclaimer … Most of my clients prefer that I not share the inner workings of their businesses or the exact details of the marketing strategies we develop. In order to be able to share my own proprietary intellectual property without violating the sensitive nature of my relationship with them, I often anonymize what I share with you. This may include changing the specifics of their industry, what actually happened, or what we developed together. When I make these changes, I work to preserve the success principle I want to convey to you while obscuring sensitive data. This is necessary.